On this page
- What should you know about Film Permit Bali first?
- Who is behind it?
- What kinds of source do we trust first?
- How do we handle sources that disagree?
- How should you read a page on this site?
- Why do we have a commercial interest?
- How can you correct an error?
- What do readers ask about this guide?
- Which sources support this page?
- How do I reach the desk?
By Film Permit Bali Editorial Desk
About Film Permit Bali in brief: this is a specialist guide to filming rules in Bali, published under Juara Holding Group, with a request desk attached. It does not issue permits, visas or drone approvals. It ranks legal text and official pages above operators and blogs, and it prints disagreements between sources openly.
What should you know about Film Permit Bali first?
The site explains what a foreign crew, or a traveller with a camera, is likely to meet in Bali: the national permit, visas, drone rules, location consent, customs paperwork and the local calendar. Its starting point is the film permit Bali overview and the sequence set out in how to get a film permit in Bali, and the other pages hang off that.
It helps to be plain about what the site is not:
- It is not a government office, a ministry, an embassy or a film commission.
- It does not issue permits, visas, flight approvals or location consents.
- It does not manage any temple, park, beach or airspace.
- It does not guarantee the outcome of any application.
Every approval described here comes from someone else. A guide can describe the route, but it cannot shorten it or decide it. Do not take anything here to mean that the desk or the group has a guarantor ID or a place on a ministry fixer list. If a partner's status matters to your application, check it at the source, as the film fixer page explains.
Who is behind it?
The site sits under Juara Holding Group. The pages are written by the Film Permit Bali Editorial Desk, and the byline stays at desk level on purpose. There is no team page and there are no individual biographies, so you cannot judge the site by anyone's CV. Judge it by whether a sentence links to something that supports it, and whether that source says what the sentence claims.
Contact is limited to one WhatsApp number and one email address. A message from any other channel claiming to come from this site should be treated with suspicion.
What kinds of source do we trust first?
Each claim is matched to the strongest kind of source that addresses it, in this order:
| Rank | Kind of source | Examples on this site | How it is used |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legal text | Regulation 48/2018 on film locations; PM 37 of 2020 on drones | States the rule, with the article where possible |
| 2 | Official agency pages | The immigration visa pages; the West Bali park page; site managers' own pages | States what that body says of its own process |
| 3 | Indonesian missions | The embassies in Canberra and Washington | States the route for applicants at that mission |
| 4 | Press quoting officials | Antara, for figures from a ministry official | Reported as quoted, with the date |
| 5 | Operators and agencies | Hoodlum; Atlas Film Fixers | Named every time, as that company's claim |
| 6 | Encyclopedias and blogs | Wikipedia, for background on places and film credits | Named every time, never as a rule |
Rank is not the same as truth. An embassy page can lag behind a change of ministry. A lower-ranked source can also be the only one that answers a practical question, such as how long a drone permit tends to take. Those answers stay on the page with the company's name beside them, so you can weigh them yourself.
Amounts of money stay out of the running text. Where a page needs them, a table shows each figure with its source and the month it was checked, because fees change and a number buried in a paragraph tends to go stale unnoticed.
How do we handle sources that disagree?
We print both sides. Here are real examples from this site:
| Question | One source | Another source | What we do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drone height without approval | PM 37: up to 400 feet (120 metres) in uncontrolled airspace | Hoodlum's page cites 150 metres | The regulation leads, and the other figure is flagged as outdated |
| Drone permit timing | Hoodlum: about four to six weeks | Atlas Film Fixers: seven to fourteen working days | Show both as estimates and do not blend them |
| Size of West Bali National Park | Park page: 77,000 hectares, about ten percent of Bali | Wikipedia: about 190 square kilometres | Show both, since neither figure is explained by the other |
The sources are PM 37 and Hoodlum on height, Atlas Film Fixers on timing, and the park page and Wikipedia on park size. The park figures differ by about four times, which is why neither is quietly chosen. Lead times get the same treatment on the processing time page, and the visa index on the filming visa page.
Three rules follow from this. We do not average figures. We do not build a range out of two different sources, because that invents a claim neither of them made. And when two official pages differ, we do not pick the more convenient one: we name the office that can settle it for your case. Where a current rule simply cannot be confirmed from what is published, the page says so instead of filling the gap with a blog's number.
How should you read a page on this site?
The wording carries information. A few conventions run through every page, and knowing them tells you how much weight a sentence can bear:
- An article number or "the regulation says" means the claim rests on a legal text. Follow the link and check it, because rules move.
- "According to" a named company means a business said it. Weigh it knowing the company also sells something.
- "Ask your mission" or "ask the manager" means the answer depends on an office that can decide your case, or that nothing published settles it.
- A date beside a figure ties that figure to a moment. A number from a 2024 press report stays a 2024 number.
Silence counts too. When a page names no fee for a place, we know of no published fee, which is a different thing from the place being free.
Why do we have a commercial interest?
A request sent to the desk may end in a paid booking, so the site has a commercial reason to exist as well as an editorial one. You should read it knowing that.
That interest has limits written into how the desk works. It does not promise a permit outcome, a location, a pilot, a schedule or availability. Any fee or price, and the company you would sign with, are set out in writing in an offer before you agree. Only that written offer binds. Conversation on WhatsApp or by email, however friendly, is not a commitment by either side.
A company named on these pages is named because it published a claim worth attributing. A mention is not a recommendation, and it tells you nothing about any commercial relationship one way or the other, so check any supplier for yourself. Our disclaimer sets out the limits of the information here.
How can you correct an error?
Rules in this field change, offices get renamed and links go dead, so corrections are useful. Agencies, missions and companies quoted on the site are welcome to send them, and so is anyone who has just been through a process and found a page out of date. A helpful message includes:
- the address of the page;
- the sentence you think is wrong;
- a link to, or copy of, the document that shows otherwise;
- the date that document was issued, if it has one.
Written evidence carries the most weight. A claim without a source can prompt a closer look, but it will not go on the page as fact. Common questions are collected in the film permit FAQ, and the contact page sets out what to include in a request.
What do readers ask about this guide?
Who runs Film Permit Bali?
The site sits under Juara Holding Group. Questions and requests go to one desk, reachable by the WhatsApp number and email address at the foot of this page.
Who writes Film Permit Bali?
The Film Permit Bali Editorial Desk. Pages carry that byline and no individual names, so the test of any page is whether its links support its sentences.
Is Film Permit Bali official?
No. It is a private guide. It does not speak for any ministry, embassy, immigration office, aviation authority, park or temple, and nothing here replaces their written word.
Does Film Permit Bali issue permits?
No. The national permit comes from the film unit under the minister responsible for culture, and visas and flight approvals come from their own authorities. Local consents come from whoever manages each location.
How does Film Permit Bali make money?
Through requests to the desk, some of which may turn into paid bookings. In that case, a written offer names the fee and the company you would contract with, and you see it before deciding.
Which sources support this page?
- Transport Ministry Regulation PM 37 of 2020 (BPK legal database)
- Hoodlum: filming in Indonesia
- Atlas Film Fixers: Bali
- West Bali National Park: general information
- Wikipedia: West Bali National Park
How do I reach the desk?
For a question, a request or a correction, write to the desk and name the page you were reading. The desk answers, and only a written offer can bind anyone to a fee, a service or a date. WhatsApp 6281139414563 or bd@juaraholding.com.
Send the desk your dates, crew size, locations, and drone plans. The desk replies in writing.
Ask the desk on WhatsApp bd@juaraholding.com